ART/ART/ART My own paintings and those of artists I admire.Also some how-to-do-it posts about landscape painting.
Thursday, 24 July 2008
Art and Photography
Looking at Aaron Scharf's "Art and Photography" the other day I thought. Is that it? It seems to me that the influence of photography on art is insignificant. The influence is all the other way. Writing about the Durieu photos which Delacroix owned is just a footnote to art history. As Sickert wisely said.The only artists who should use photographs are those who have no need of them. In other words use photographs as an aide-memoire if you wish.
Wednesday, 16 July 2008
A Poor Sense of Colour
There is something distinctly old fashioned about much landscape photography in Britain-especially that of the amateur with more equipment than he can manage. Photographers oftene seem to be lacking in any modern sense of colour. So much of what they produce relates more to a landscapist such as J C Dahl than to Monet or Seurat. There is considerable gloom along with occasional flashes of something more lurid.
One of the problems is HDR. I'm not sure that it lives up to its name in providing a High Dynamic Range. I have rarely seen an HDR colour image which wasn't weirdly lurid. Maybe Dunstanburgh and Bamburgh should be patrolled so that anyone carrying a tripod can be turned away .
And another thing....that ridiculous remark to the effect that, "From today painting is dead". I could replace it with a question. There are times when I am tempted to ask,"When will photography come to life?"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)