J Ruskin by J Millais-begun July 1853
completed Autumn 1854.
It seemed to me when I saw it last- a few weeks ago- to be a rather sad painting.The complicated and often difficult circumstances of the commission may have something to do with this. One thing struck me:the proportions of the figure are not really satifactory and the head sits uneasily on the shoulders of a figure which is not quite at ease.It portrays a very thin person. The proportions of head to figure are extreme but no where near so extraordinary as you get with Sargent.Where is Ruskin's waist? Is the mouth a little too "set"? That may or not be connected with Ruskin's childhood accident. Curiously enough John Dixon Hunt says that the figure had not been begun when the subject left Glenfinlas,"...although the background was almost complete,there was no figure at all in the landscape...." But surely it would have been roughed in to some degree? If you are painting inch by inch, as Ruskin described there must have been some sketching in.An efficient painter does not look to waste effort by having to overlay areas already realised.
Again,the strained circumstances-the work being completed from life after Effie had left Ruskin and returned to her family in Perth- are surely relevant.The personal relationship between Ruskin and Millais too was entering its final stages.Any hope that Ruskin may have had of Millais becoming a great landscapist-in JR's view of things- was not to be.
I do not recall that Ruskin ever gave his own criticism of the portrait. It remained with his parents until they died.He gave it afterwards to his old friend Henry Acland. (revised Aug2013)
For another post on the portrait see here
The Wider Sea: John Dixon Hunt,London 1982.page 227.
No comments:
Post a Comment